Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mio Mushika vs Ho Ching Wu Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mushika vs Wu analysis and find out who is favored!
Mio Mushika vs Ho Ching Wu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mushika 0 - 0 Wu
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mushika has won 45.49% of points on their second serve, while Wu has won 41.02%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mushika, in recent form, has won 57.77% of their opponent's second serve points, while Wu has won 58.93%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.29% and 41.79% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mushika has saved 54.02% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wu has saved 54.32% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mushika has won 52.46% of matches played (W/L 32/ 29), with Wu winning 60% (W/L 33/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mushika has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 75% (W/L 6/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 25% (W/L 2/ 6). Wu has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 10/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 247/ 244).
- Player level: In the last year, Mushika has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 21/ 21), where as Wu has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 70.59% of matches (W/L 24/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mushika has played against opponents with an average rank of 242.15 while Wu has played against players with an average rank of 76.2.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mushika has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wu has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mushika has converted 50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wu has converted 48.68% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
582
Rank
561
High
18
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
570
Rank
536
High
32
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
56% (72-57)
Career Total W/L
51% (259-251)
48% (14-15)
YTD W/L
62% (18-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$1,005
1
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Mio Mushika vs Ho Ching Wu For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Mushika VS Wu
Sportsbook
Offer
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mio Mushika | Ho Ching Wu |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (14/15) | 62% (18/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (35/29) | 59% (39/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (302/261) | 54% (315/269) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (11/11) | 62% (18/11) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.08 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 21 | 31 |
| DFs per game | 0.34 | 0.55 |
| DFs Total | 93 | 158 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:20 | 1:41:10 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 214.45 | 76.83 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1097/1831) | 63% (1174/1873) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (650/1097) | 62% (730/1174) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (339/734) | 41% (284/699) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (121/239) | 49% (124/253) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (827/1729) | 48% (870/1800) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 40% (6/9) | 40% (4/6) |
| Futures W/L | 57% (8/6) | 74% (14/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (14/27) | 62% (18/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 13% (1/8) | 63% (5/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 81% (16/13) | 85% (20/17) |
| 1st set W, L | 19% (16/3) | 15% (20/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (13/1) | 11% (9/1) |
Mio Mushika Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Akiko Omae
Player
Mio Mushika
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
75%
(
66 of
88)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
51%
(
41 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
51 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mio Mushika
Player
Aely Arai
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve %
71%
(
30 of
42)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
16 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mio Mushika
Player
Funa Kozaki
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
50%
(
20 of
40)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ayumi Miyamoto
Player
Mio Mushika
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nanari Katsumi
Player
Mio Mushika
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Mio Mushika
Player
Ikumi Yamazaki
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
70%
(
73 of
104)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
53%
(
57 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
104)
101
Total Points Won
111
|
1-6 7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mio Mushika
Player
Yui Chikaraishi
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mio Mushika
Player
Nagomi Higashitani
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mio Mushika
Player
Rio Tsuda
44%
(
18 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
27 of
39)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
0
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
12)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
41%
(
17 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ho Ching Wu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jia-Jing Lu
Player
Ho Ching Wu
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
6
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
35 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ho Ching Wu
Player
Ruirui Zou
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
38 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hiromi Abe
Player
Ho Ching Wu
77%
(
57 of
74)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Ho Ching Wu
77%
(
58 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
94)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
6 of
6)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
94)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ho Ching Wu
Player
Honori Koyama
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ho Ching Wu
Player
Fang An Lin
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
1
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
7
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
51%
(
46 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
86
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| F | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Ho Ching Wu
Player
Funa Kozaki
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ho Ching Wu
Player
Yui Ohwaki
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
-
Aces
-
8
Double Faults
4
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ho Ching Wu
Player
Yura Nakagawa
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Mushika Vs Wu Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Mushika are available here and Wu photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
